Who Cares? Welfare and Consent to Child Emigration from England to Canada, 1870-1918Citation formats

Standard

Who Cares? Welfare and Consent to Child Emigration from England to Canada, 1870-1918. / Lamont, Ruth; Moss, Eloise; Wildman - Tarozzi, Charlotte.

In: Liverpool Law Review, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{c58314d33c754e4ba478196beb656583,
title = "Who Cares? Welfare and Consent to Child Emigration from England to Canada, 1870-1918",
abstract = "From the 1870{\textquoteright}s, children in the care of charities or state provided institutions, including workhouses and industrial schools, were subject to the practice of emigration to Canada, separating them from their parents and wider family. This was achieved ostensibly to secure the child{\textquoteright}s welfare, and provide opportunities in Canada beyond the poverty of the industrialising cities of the north of England. Using original archive material, this article examines the legal rights of parents of children identified for emigration, and how charities and state institutions obtained the authority to emigrate children. The lack of a clear basis for assessing child welfare led organisations to consider a broad range of moralistic considerations regarding the characterisation of parents and the child{\textquoteright}s circumstances in deciding whether a child should be emigrated. Despite these negative perceptions, it will be demonstrated that some parentsexercised considerable agency in seeking to resist emigration of a child, and inattempting to maintain the familial relationship.",
keywords = "Child emigration; child protection; welfare; legal history; child law",
author = "Ruth Lamont and Eloise Moss and {Wildman - Tarozzi}, Charlotte",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/s10991-019-09234-y",
language = "English",
journal = "Liverpool Law Review",
issn = "1572-8625",
publisher = "Springer Nature",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who Cares? Welfare and Consent to Child Emigration from England to Canada, 1870-1918

AU - Lamont, Ruth

AU - Moss, Eloise

AU - Wildman - Tarozzi, Charlotte

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - From the 1870’s, children in the care of charities or state provided institutions, including workhouses and industrial schools, were subject to the practice of emigration to Canada, separating them from their parents and wider family. This was achieved ostensibly to secure the child’s welfare, and provide opportunities in Canada beyond the poverty of the industrialising cities of the north of England. Using original archive material, this article examines the legal rights of parents of children identified for emigration, and how charities and state institutions obtained the authority to emigrate children. The lack of a clear basis for assessing child welfare led organisations to consider a broad range of moralistic considerations regarding the characterisation of parents and the child’s circumstances in deciding whether a child should be emigrated. Despite these negative perceptions, it will be demonstrated that some parentsexercised considerable agency in seeking to resist emigration of a child, and inattempting to maintain the familial relationship.

AB - From the 1870’s, children in the care of charities or state provided institutions, including workhouses and industrial schools, were subject to the practice of emigration to Canada, separating them from their parents and wider family. This was achieved ostensibly to secure the child’s welfare, and provide opportunities in Canada beyond the poverty of the industrialising cities of the north of England. Using original archive material, this article examines the legal rights of parents of children identified for emigration, and how charities and state institutions obtained the authority to emigrate children. The lack of a clear basis for assessing child welfare led organisations to consider a broad range of moralistic considerations regarding the characterisation of parents and the child’s circumstances in deciding whether a child should be emigrated. Despite these negative perceptions, it will be demonstrated that some parentsexercised considerable agency in seeking to resist emigration of a child, and inattempting to maintain the familial relationship.

KW - Child emigration; child protection; welfare; legal history; child law

U2 - 10.1007/s10991-019-09234-y

DO - 10.1007/s10991-019-09234-y

M3 - Article

JO - Liverpool Law Review

JF - Liverpool Law Review

SN - 1572-8625

ER -