Understanding transition pathways by bridging modelling, transition and practice-based studiesCitation formats

  • Authors:
  • Andries F. Hof
  • Detlef P. van Vuuren
  • Frans Berkhout
  • Frank W. Geels

Standard

Understanding transition pathways by bridging modelling, transition and practice-based studies : Editorial introduction to the special issue. / Hof, Andries F.; van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Berkhout, Frans; Geels, Frank W.

In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 03.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Hof, Andries F. ; van Vuuren, Detlef P. ; Berkhout, Frans ; Geels, Frank W. / Understanding transition pathways by bridging modelling, transition and practice-based studies : Editorial introduction to the special issue. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019.

Bibtex

@article{b9224369b3244e9ab26534ad63f2511b,
title = "Understanding transition pathways by bridging modelling, transition and practice-based studies: Editorial introduction to the special issue",
abstract = "This paper presents an introduction to and overview of the papers in this Special Issue of Technological Forecasting & Social Change on ‘Transition Pathways’ is presented. Each of these papers are an output of the PATHWAYS project (EC FP7-funded, 2013–2017) which looked into ways to integrate alternative approaches for analysing sustainability transitions. Methods to bridge across scenario-modelling, socio-technical transition, and practice-based action research approaches (Turnheim et al. 2015; Geels et al., 2016) were implemented in eight empirical and modelling studies reported here. A variety of approaches to bridging emerged in practice, with differing methodological strategies employed, analysing transitions processes across different sectors, at a range of scales, and separately, comparatively or in a fully integrated way. This paper suggests a framework for understanding different approaches to bridging and shows how policy- and decision-making can be enriched by theoretically- and empirically-informed bridging approaches to transitions analysis.",
author = "Hof, {Andries F.} and {van Vuuren}, {Detlef P.} and Frans Berkhout and Geels, {Frank W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.023",
language = "English",
journal = "Technological Forecasting and Social Change",
issn = "0040-1625",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding transition pathways by bridging modelling, transition and practice-based studies

T2 - Editorial introduction to the special issue

AU - Hof, Andries F.

AU - van Vuuren, Detlef P.

AU - Berkhout, Frans

AU - Geels, Frank W.

PY - 2019/6/3

Y1 - 2019/6/3

N2 - This paper presents an introduction to and overview of the papers in this Special Issue of Technological Forecasting & Social Change on ‘Transition Pathways’ is presented. Each of these papers are an output of the PATHWAYS project (EC FP7-funded, 2013–2017) which looked into ways to integrate alternative approaches for analysing sustainability transitions. Methods to bridge across scenario-modelling, socio-technical transition, and practice-based action research approaches (Turnheim et al. 2015; Geels et al., 2016) were implemented in eight empirical and modelling studies reported here. A variety of approaches to bridging emerged in practice, with differing methodological strategies employed, analysing transitions processes across different sectors, at a range of scales, and separately, comparatively or in a fully integrated way. This paper suggests a framework for understanding different approaches to bridging and shows how policy- and decision-making can be enriched by theoretically- and empirically-informed bridging approaches to transitions analysis.

AB - This paper presents an introduction to and overview of the papers in this Special Issue of Technological Forecasting & Social Change on ‘Transition Pathways’ is presented. Each of these papers are an output of the PATHWAYS project (EC FP7-funded, 2013–2017) which looked into ways to integrate alternative approaches for analysing sustainability transitions. Methods to bridge across scenario-modelling, socio-technical transition, and practice-based action research approaches (Turnheim et al. 2015; Geels et al., 2016) were implemented in eight empirical and modelling studies reported here. A variety of approaches to bridging emerged in practice, with differing methodological strategies employed, analysing transitions processes across different sectors, at a range of scales, and separately, comparatively or in a fully integrated way. This paper suggests a framework for understanding different approaches to bridging and shows how policy- and decision-making can be enriched by theoretically- and empirically-informed bridging approaches to transitions analysis.

U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.023

DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.023

M3 - Editorial

JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

SN - 0040-1625

ER -