Understanding low uptake of bone anchored hearing ads: A review.Citation formats

Standard

Understanding low uptake of bone anchored hearing ads: A review. / Powell, Rachael; Wearden, Alison; Pardesi, Sophie M; Green, Kevin.

In: Journal of Laryngology and Otology, Vol. 131, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 190-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

Powell, R, Wearden, A, Pardesi, SM & Green, K 2017, 'Understanding low uptake of bone anchored hearing ads: A review.', Journal of Laryngology and Otology, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116009981

APA

Powell, R., Wearden, A., Pardesi, S. M., & Green, K. (2017). Understanding low uptake of bone anchored hearing ads: A review. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 131(3), 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116009981

Vancouver

Powell R, Wearden A, Pardesi SM, Green K. Understanding low uptake of bone anchored hearing ads: A review. Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 2017 Mar 1;131(3):190-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116009981

Author

Powell, Rachael ; Wearden, Alison ; Pardesi, Sophie M ; Green, Kevin. / Understanding low uptake of bone anchored hearing ads: A review. In: Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 2017 ; Vol. 131, No. 3. pp. 190-201.

Bibtex

@article{3dcac46355c643a882c5ca5e9c94d940,
title = "Understanding low uptake of bone anchored hearing ads: A review.",
abstract = "Background: Bone anchored hearing aids (Baha) improve hearing for patients for whom conventional behind-the-ear aids are problematic. However, uptake of Baha is low and it is important to understand why this is the case. Method: A narrative review was conducted. Studies examining why people accept or decline Baha and satisfaction in people with Baha were reviewed. Results: Reasons for declining Baha included limited perceived benefits, concerns about surgery, aesthetic concerns and treatment cost. No studies providing in-depth analysis of reasons for declining or accepting Baha were identified. Studies of patient satisfaction showed that most participants reported benefits with Baha. However, most studies used cross-sectional and/or retrospective designs and only included people with Baha. Conclusions: Important avenues for further research are: in-depth qualitative research designed to fully understand the Baha decision-making process, and rigorous quantitative research comparing satisfaction in people who receive Baha with those who receive alternative (or no) treatments.",
author = "Rachael Powell and Alison Wearden and Pardesi, {Sophie M} and Kevin Green",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0022215116009981",
language = "English",
volume = "131",
pages = "190--201",
journal = "The Journal of laryngology and otology",
issn = "0022-2151",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding low uptake of bone anchored hearing ads: A review.

AU - Powell, Rachael

AU - Wearden, Alison

AU - Pardesi, Sophie M

AU - Green, Kevin

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background: Bone anchored hearing aids (Baha) improve hearing for patients for whom conventional behind-the-ear aids are problematic. However, uptake of Baha is low and it is important to understand why this is the case. Method: A narrative review was conducted. Studies examining why people accept or decline Baha and satisfaction in people with Baha were reviewed. Results: Reasons for declining Baha included limited perceived benefits, concerns about surgery, aesthetic concerns and treatment cost. No studies providing in-depth analysis of reasons for declining or accepting Baha were identified. Studies of patient satisfaction showed that most participants reported benefits with Baha. However, most studies used cross-sectional and/or retrospective designs and only included people with Baha. Conclusions: Important avenues for further research are: in-depth qualitative research designed to fully understand the Baha decision-making process, and rigorous quantitative research comparing satisfaction in people who receive Baha with those who receive alternative (or no) treatments.

AB - Background: Bone anchored hearing aids (Baha) improve hearing for patients for whom conventional behind-the-ear aids are problematic. However, uptake of Baha is low and it is important to understand why this is the case. Method: A narrative review was conducted. Studies examining why people accept or decline Baha and satisfaction in people with Baha were reviewed. Results: Reasons for declining Baha included limited perceived benefits, concerns about surgery, aesthetic concerns and treatment cost. No studies providing in-depth analysis of reasons for declining or accepting Baha were identified. Studies of patient satisfaction showed that most participants reported benefits with Baha. However, most studies used cross-sectional and/or retrospective designs and only included people with Baha. Conclusions: Important avenues for further research are: in-depth qualitative research designed to fully understand the Baha decision-making process, and rigorous quantitative research comparing satisfaction in people who receive Baha with those who receive alternative (or no) treatments.

U2 - 10.1017/S0022215116009981

DO - 10.1017/S0022215116009981

M3 - Review article

VL - 131

SP - 190

EP - 201

JO - The Journal of laryngology and otology

JF - The Journal of laryngology and otology

SN - 0022-2151

IS - 3

ER -