Troubling PopularisationCitation formats

Standard

Troubling Popularisation : On the Gendered Circuits of a 'Scientific' Knowledge of Sex. / Doan, Laura.

In: Gender & History, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2019, p. 304-318.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{58940145b87c41c6ae39419083436ea8,
title = "Troubling Popularisation: On the Gendered Circuits of a 'Scientific' Knowledge of Sex",
abstract = "With the recent transnational turn in sexology studies, scholars have been highly effective in demonstrating the dialogical nature of exchanges between sexologists and other professionals. Even so, the problem of what counts as “sexological” still haunts the field. One way to circumvent this impasse on the vexing question of disciplinarity is to, first, think about knowledge production in relation to knowledge exchange and, second, bring gender into the frame. Drawing on the critique of popularization developed by historians and sociologists of science, I turn to the British Society for the Study of Sex Psychology as a case study to argue that popularization is a blunt instrument, providing limited understanding of the gendered nature of knowledge acquisition and circulation. A different model—called ventilation—allows the historian to step outside the logic of popularization to explain how dissemination itself bestowed agency to ordinary women and men, who became co-producers of modern sexual knowledge. ",
keywords = "popularisation, sexology, public dissemination, sexual knowledge, gendered knowledge",
author = "Laura Doan",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1111/1468-0424.12430",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "304--318",
journal = "Gender and History",
issn = "0953-5233",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Troubling Popularisation

T2 - On the Gendered Circuits of a 'Scientific' Knowledge of Sex

AU - Doan, Laura

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - With the recent transnational turn in sexology studies, scholars have been highly effective in demonstrating the dialogical nature of exchanges between sexologists and other professionals. Even so, the problem of what counts as “sexological” still haunts the field. One way to circumvent this impasse on the vexing question of disciplinarity is to, first, think about knowledge production in relation to knowledge exchange and, second, bring gender into the frame. Drawing on the critique of popularization developed by historians and sociologists of science, I turn to the British Society for the Study of Sex Psychology as a case study to argue that popularization is a blunt instrument, providing limited understanding of the gendered nature of knowledge acquisition and circulation. A different model—called ventilation—allows the historian to step outside the logic of popularization to explain how dissemination itself bestowed agency to ordinary women and men, who became co-producers of modern sexual knowledge.

AB - With the recent transnational turn in sexology studies, scholars have been highly effective in demonstrating the dialogical nature of exchanges between sexologists and other professionals. Even so, the problem of what counts as “sexological” still haunts the field. One way to circumvent this impasse on the vexing question of disciplinarity is to, first, think about knowledge production in relation to knowledge exchange and, second, bring gender into the frame. Drawing on the critique of popularization developed by historians and sociologists of science, I turn to the British Society for the Study of Sex Psychology as a case study to argue that popularization is a blunt instrument, providing limited understanding of the gendered nature of knowledge acquisition and circulation. A different model—called ventilation—allows the historian to step outside the logic of popularization to explain how dissemination itself bestowed agency to ordinary women and men, who became co-producers of modern sexual knowledge.

KW - popularisation, sexology, public dissemination, sexual knowledge, gendered knowledge

U2 - 10.1111/1468-0424.12430

DO - 10.1111/1468-0424.12430

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 304

EP - 318

JO - Gender and History

JF - Gender and History

SN - 0953-5233

IS - 2

ER -