The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • External authors:
  • F. Kern
  • G. Fuchs
  • N. Hinderer
  • G. Kungl
  • M. Neukirch
  • S. Wassermann

Abstract

This paper aims to make two contributions to the sustainability transitions literature, in particular the Geels and Schot (2007) transition pathways typology. First, it reformulates and differentiates the typology through the lens of endogenous enactment, identifying the main patterns for actors, formal institutions, and technologies. Second, it suggests that transitions may shift between pathways, depending on struggles over technology deployment and institutions. Both contributions are demonstrated with a comparative analysis of unfolding low-carbon electricity transitions in Germany and the UK between 1990-2014. The analysis shows that Germany is on a substitution pathway, enacted by new entrants deploying small-scale renewable electricity technologies (RETs), while the UK is on a transformation pathway, enacted by incumbent actors deploying large-scale RETs. Further analysis shows that the German transition has recently shifted from a '˜stretch-and-transform'™ substitution pathway to a '˜fit-and-conform'™ pathway, because of a fightback from utilities and altered institutions. It also shows that the UK transition moved from moderate to substantial incumbent reorientation, as government policies became stronger. Recent policy changes, however, substantially downscaled UK renewables support, which is likely to shift the transition back to weaker reorientation.

Bibliographical metadata

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)896-913
Number of pages17
JournalResearch Policy
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Feb 2016

Related information

Researchers

View all