The effectiveness of a coordinated preventive care approach for healthy ageing (UHCE) among older persons in five European cities: A pre-post controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  • External authors:
  • Carmen B. Franse
  • Amy Van Grieken
  • Tamara Alhambra-borrás
  • Elisa Valía-cotanda
  • Rob Van Staveren
  • Tasos Rentoumis
  • Athina Markaki
  • Lovorka Bilajac
  • Vanja Vasiljev Marchesi
  • Tomislav Rukavina
  • Elin Koppelaar
  • Rens Martijn
  • Antonius J.j. Voorham
  • Francesco Mattace Raso
  • Jorge Garcés-ferrer
  • Hein Raat

Abstract

Background

Older persons often have multiple health and social problems and need a variety of health services. A coordinated preventive approach that integrates the provision of health and social care services could promote healthy ageing. Such an approach can be organised differently, depending on the availability and organizational structures in the local context. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the effectiveness of a coordinated preventive care approach in various European settings.

Objectives

This study explored the effects of a coordinated preventive health and social care approach on the lifestyle, health and quality of life of community-dwelling older persons in five European cities.

Design

International multi-center pre-post controlled trial.

Setting

Community settings in cities in the United Kingdom, Greece, Croatia, the Netherlands and Spain.

Participants

1844 community-dwelling older persons (mean age = 79.5; SD = 5.6).

Methods

The Urban Health Centres Europe (UHCE) approach consisted of a preventive multidimensional health assessment and, if a person was at-risk, coordinated care-pathways targeted at fall risk, appropriate medication use, loneliness and frailty. Intervention and control sites were chosen based on their location in distinct neighbourhoods in the participating cities. Persons in the catchment area of the intervention sites ‘the intervention group’ received the UHCE approach and persons in catchment areas of the control sites ‘the control group’ received care as usual. A questionnaire and two measurements were taken at baseline and at one-year follow-up to assess healthy lifestyle, fall risk, appropriate medication use, loneliness level, frailty, level of independence, health-related quality of life and care use. To evaluate differences in outcomes between intervention group and control group for the total study population, for those who received follow-up care-pathways and for each city separately (multilevel) logistic and linear regression analyses were used.

Results

Persons in the intervention group had less recurrent falls (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.48; 0.88) and lower frailty (B=-0.43, 95% CI= −0.65 to −0.22) at follow-up compared with persons in the control group. Physical health-related quality of life and mental well-being was better (B = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.14–1.76; and B = 1.50; 95% CI = 0.15–2.84 respectively). The effects of the UHCE approach were stronger in the subgroup of persons (53.6%) enrolled in care-pathways.

Conclusions

Our study found promising but minor effects for the use of a coordinated preventive health and social care approach for the promotion of healthy ageing of older persons. Future studies should further evaluate effects of coordinated preventive health and social care aimed at healthy ageing.

Bibliographical metadata

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-162
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume88
Early online date7 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Related information

Researchers

View all