Supporting medication adherence for adults with cystic fibrosis: A randomised feasibility study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • External authors:
  • Daniel Hind
  • Sarah J. Drabble
  • Madelynne A. Arden
  • Laura Mandefield
  • Simon Waterhouse
  • Chin Maguire
  • Hannah Cantrill
  • Louisa Robinson
  • Daniel Beever
  • Alexander J. Scott
  • Sam Keating
  • Marlene Hutchings
  • Judy Bradley
  • Julia Nightingale
  • Mark I. Allenby
  • Jane Dewar
  • Pauline Whelan
  • Stephen J. Walters
  • Alicia O'Cathain
  • Martin J. Wildman

Abstract

Background: Preventative medication reduces hospitalisations in people with cystic fibrosis (PWCF) but adherence is poor. We assessed the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention, which combines display of real time adherence data and behaviour change techniques. Methods: Design: Pilot, open-label, parallel-group RCT with concurrent semi-structured interviews. Participants: PWCF at two Cystic Fibrosis (CF) units. Eligible: aged 16 or older; on the CF registry. Ineligible: post-lung transplant or on the active list; unable to consent; using dry powder inhalers. Interventions: Central randomisation on a 1:1 allocation to: (1) intervention, linking nebuliser use with data recording and transfer capability to a software platform, and behavioural strategies to support self-management delivered by trained interventionists (n = 32); or, (2) control, typically face-to-face meetings every 3 months with CF team (n = 32). Outcomes: RCT feasibility defined as: recruitment of ≥ 48 participants (75% of target) in four months (pilot primary outcome); valid exacerbation data available for ≥ 85% of those randomised (future RCT primary outcome); change in % medication adherence; FEV 1 percent predicted (key secondaries in future RCT); and perceptions of trial procedures, in semi-structured interviews with intervention (n = 14) and control (n = 5) participants, interventionists (n = 3) and CF team members (n = 5). Results: The pilot trial recruited to target, randomising 33 to intervention and 31 to control in the four-month period, June-September 2016. At study completion (30th April 2017), 60 (94%; Intervention = 32, Control =28) participants contributed good quality exacerbation data (intervention: 35 exacerbations; control: 25 exacerbation). The mean change in adherence and baseline-adjusted FEV 1 percent predicted were higher in the intervention arm by 10% (95% CI: -5.2 to 25.2) and 5% (95% CI -2 to 12%) respectively. Five serious adverse events occurred, none related to the intervention. The mean change in adherence was 10% (95% CI: -5.2 to 25.2), greater in the intervention arm. Interventionists delivered insufficient numbers of review sessions due to concentration on participant recruitment. This left interventionists insufficient time for key intervention procedures. A total of 10 key changes that were made to RCT procedures are summarised. Conclusions: With improved research processes and lower monthly participant recruitment targets, a full-scale trial is feasible. Trial registration: ISRCTN13076797. Prospectively registered on 07/06/2016.

Bibliographical metadata

Original languageEnglish
Article number77
JournalBMC Pulmonary Medicine
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Apr 2019