Safe for DemocracyCitation formats

Standard

Safe for Democracy : Constitutional Politics, Popular Spectacle, and the British Monarchy 1910–1914. . / Mort, Frank.

In: Journal of British Studies, Vol. 58, No. 1, 27.03.2019, p. 109-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{05a94f6dbafb42e896680a6a64eb19a4,
title = "Safe for Democracy: Constitutional Politics, Popular Spectacle, and the British Monarchy 1910–1914. ",
abstract = "How did the British monarchy respond to the multiple challenges of early twentieth-century mass democracy? Historians have separated the growth of constitutional sovereignty from the practice of a welfare monarchy, or from royalty as decorative and media friendly. This article argues that the political transformation of the modern monarchy was inseparable from innovations to its style and presentation. Opening with the dramatic constitutional crisis that confronted George V and his advisors in 1910, I show how the monarchy's entanglement in high politics forced the crown to assume an increasingly neutral, arbitrarial stance on industrial disputes and on the Irish question, despite the king's own conservatism. Simultaneously, George V invested in styles of royal accessibility and informality that contrasted sharply with other major European dynasties, in a series of royal tours across the industrial heartlands England and Wales in 1912 and 1913. Extensively covered by the national and imperial press and by the newsreels, these visits to the strongholds of laborism promoted a vision of patrician democracy that drew heavily on traditions of organic, one-nation conservatism. But they also positioned royalty and the people in a new imaginary relationship that was more personal and intimate. Both versions had long-term consequences for the British monarchy across the twentieth century.",
keywords = "Monarchy, Democracy, Media",
author = "Frank Mort",
year = "2019",
month = mar,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1017/jbr.2018.176",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "109--141",
journal = "Journal of British Studies",
issn = "0021-9371",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safe for Democracy

T2 - Constitutional Politics, Popular Spectacle, and the British Monarchy 1910–1914.

AU - Mort, Frank

PY - 2019/3/27

Y1 - 2019/3/27

N2 - How did the British monarchy respond to the multiple challenges of early twentieth-century mass democracy? Historians have separated the growth of constitutional sovereignty from the practice of a welfare monarchy, or from royalty as decorative and media friendly. This article argues that the political transformation of the modern monarchy was inseparable from innovations to its style and presentation. Opening with the dramatic constitutional crisis that confronted George V and his advisors in 1910, I show how the monarchy's entanglement in high politics forced the crown to assume an increasingly neutral, arbitrarial stance on industrial disputes and on the Irish question, despite the king's own conservatism. Simultaneously, George V invested in styles of royal accessibility and informality that contrasted sharply with other major European dynasties, in a series of royal tours across the industrial heartlands England and Wales in 1912 and 1913. Extensively covered by the national and imperial press and by the newsreels, these visits to the strongholds of laborism promoted a vision of patrician democracy that drew heavily on traditions of organic, one-nation conservatism. But they also positioned royalty and the people in a new imaginary relationship that was more personal and intimate. Both versions had long-term consequences for the British monarchy across the twentieth century.

AB - How did the British monarchy respond to the multiple challenges of early twentieth-century mass democracy? Historians have separated the growth of constitutional sovereignty from the practice of a welfare monarchy, or from royalty as decorative and media friendly. This article argues that the political transformation of the modern monarchy was inseparable from innovations to its style and presentation. Opening with the dramatic constitutional crisis that confronted George V and his advisors in 1910, I show how the monarchy's entanglement in high politics forced the crown to assume an increasingly neutral, arbitrarial stance on industrial disputes and on the Irish question, despite the king's own conservatism. Simultaneously, George V invested in styles of royal accessibility and informality that contrasted sharply with other major European dynasties, in a series of royal tours across the industrial heartlands England and Wales in 1912 and 1913. Extensively covered by the national and imperial press and by the newsreels, these visits to the strongholds of laborism promoted a vision of patrician democracy that drew heavily on traditions of organic, one-nation conservatism. But they also positioned royalty and the people in a new imaginary relationship that was more personal and intimate. Both versions had long-term consequences for the British monarchy across the twentieth century.

KW - Monarchy

KW - Democracy

KW - Media

U2 - 10.1017/jbr.2018.176

DO - 10.1017/jbr.2018.176

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 109

EP - 141

JO - Journal of British Studies

JF - Journal of British Studies

SN - 0021-9371

IS - 1

ER -