Population pharmacokinetic analysis of ropivacaine and its metabolite 2′,6′-pipecoloxylidide from pooled data in neonates, infants, and children

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • External authors:
  • B. Sadler
  • M. Pitsiu
  • J. Sjövall
  • J. Henriksson
  • V. Molnár

Abstract

Background The aim was to characterize ropivacaine and 2′,6′- pipecoloxylidide (PPX) pharmacokinetics and factors affecting them in paediatric anaesthesia. Methods Population pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine and its active metabolite PPX were estimated after single and continuous ropivacaine blocks in 192 patients aged 0-12 yr from six pooled published studies. Unbound and total ropivacaine and PPX plasma concentration and PPX urinary excretion data were used for non-linear mixed-effects modelling by NONMEM. Covariates included age, body weight, gender, ethnic origin, ASA, site and method of administration, and total dose. Results One-compartment first-order pharmacokinetic models incorporating linear binding of ropivacaine and PPX to α1-acid glycoprotein were used. After accounting for the effect of body weight, clearance of unbound ropivacaine and PPX reached 41 and 89 of their mature values, respectively, at the age of 6 months. Ropivacaine half-life decreased with age from 13 h in the newborn to 3 h beyond 1 yr. PPX half-life differed from 19 h in the newborn to 8-11 h between 1 and 12 months to 17 h after 1 yr. Simulations indicate that for a single caudal block, the recommended dose could be increased by a factor of 2.9 (0-1 month group) and 6.3 (1-12 yr group) before the unbound plasma concentrations would cross the threshold for systemic toxicity. Corresponding factors for continuous epidural infusion are 1.8 and 4.9. Conclusions Ropivacaine and PPX unbound clearance depends on body weight and age. The results support approved dose recommendations of ropivacaine for the paediatric population. © The Author [2011].

Bibliographical metadata

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)409-424
Number of pages15
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume107
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011