Ontology Stratification Methods: a Comparative Study

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Comparing the importance of axioms in ontologies is an es- sential task in a variety of applications such as ontology repair and in- consistency management. It guides the choice of axioms to remain in the ontology or which should prevail when a conflict arises. While evaluating the importance of an axiom is difficult, there are different approaches to stratify ontologies by criteria that act as proxies for importance. How- ever, there is little work about how these methods are related and their adequacy considering different applications. In this work, we evaluate specificity and modularity-based stratification approaches, and work to- wards understanding how they relate. We compare empirically the result of five stratification methods over a corpus of real-world ontologies. In particular, we investigate correlations between their rankings and their ability to distinguish axioms.

Bibliographical metadata

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Workshop on Ontology Modularity, Contextuality, and Evolution
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018