NGOs, trust, and the accountability agendaCitation formats
Standard
NGOs, trust, and the accountability agenda. / Keating, Vincent Charles; Thrandardottir, Erla.
In: British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 134-151.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - NGOs, trust, and the accountability agenda
AU - Keating, Vincent Charles
AU - Thrandardottir, Erla
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are undergoing an alleged crisis of trustworthiness. The past decades have seen an increase in both academic and practitioner scepticism, particularly given the transformations many NGOs have undergone in size, professionalism, and political importance. The accountability agenda, which stresses transparency and external oversight, has gained a significant amount of traction as a means to solve this crisis. But the causal link between the implementation of these recommendations and increased trustworthiness among donors has never been considered. This article bridges this gap by drawing on theoretical innovations in trust research to put forward three arguments. First, the proponents of the accountability agenda are implicitly working with a rational model of trust. Second, this model does not reflect important social characteristics of trust between donors and NGOs. Third, this mismatch means that the accountability agenda might do more to harm trust in NGOs than to help it.
AB - Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are undergoing an alleged crisis of trustworthiness. The past decades have seen an increase in both academic and practitioner scepticism, particularly given the transformations many NGOs have undergone in size, professionalism, and political importance. The accountability agenda, which stresses transparency and external oversight, has gained a significant amount of traction as a means to solve this crisis. But the causal link between the implementation of these recommendations and increased trustworthiness among donors has never been considered. This article bridges this gap by drawing on theoretical innovations in trust research to put forward three arguments. First, the proponents of the accountability agenda are implicitly working with a rational model of trust. Second, this model does not reflect important social characteristics of trust between donors and NGOs. Third, this mismatch means that the accountability agenda might do more to harm trust in NGOs than to help it.
KW - accountability
KW - institutional oversight
KW - NGOs
KW - transparency
KW - trust
KW - trust building
U2 - 10.1177/1369148116682655
DO - 10.1177/1369148116682655
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85011579279
VL - 19
SP - 134
EP - 151
JO - British Journal of Politics and International Relations
JF - British Journal of Politics and International Relations
SN - 1369-1481
IS - 1
ER -