Large meta-analysis of multiple cancers reveals a common, compact and highly prognostic hypoxia metageneCitation formats

  • Authors:
  • F. M. Buffa
  • A. L. Harris
  • C. M. West
  • C. J. Miller

Standard

Large meta-analysis of multiple cancers reveals a common, compact and highly prognostic hypoxia metagene. / Buffa, F. M.; Harris, A. L.; West, C. M.; Miller, C. J.

In: British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 103, No. 7, 28.09.2010, p. 1136.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Buffa, F. M. ; Harris, A. L. ; West, C. M. ; Miller, C. J. / Large meta-analysis of multiple cancers reveals a common, compact and highly prognostic hypoxia metagene. In: British Journal of Cancer. 2010 ; Vol. 103, No. 7. pp. 1136.

Bibtex

@article{42cca9c85e814f41a43d135dce730f0a,
title = "Large meta-analysis of multiple cancers reveals a common, compact and highly prognostic hypoxia metagene",
abstract = "Upon publication of the above paper in early 2010, the authors noticed that a previous version of Supplementary Table S5 had been uploaded. The incorrect version did not rank the genes in order, which was vital to the understanding of their relative significance. The publishers apologise for this error and have now uploaded the correct Table S5 to accompany the paper online.",
author = "Buffa, {F. M.} and Harris, {A. L.} and West, {C. M.} and Miller, {C. J.}",
year = "2010",
month = sep,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1038/sj.bjc.6605933",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "1136",
journal = "BJC",
issn = "0007-0920",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Large meta-analysis of multiple cancers reveals a common, compact and highly prognostic hypoxia metagene

AU - Buffa, F. M.

AU - Harris, A. L.

AU - West, C. M.

AU - Miller, C. J.

PY - 2010/9/28

Y1 - 2010/9/28

N2 - Upon publication of the above paper in early 2010, the authors noticed that a previous version of Supplementary Table S5 had been uploaded. The incorrect version did not rank the genes in order, which was vital to the understanding of their relative significance. The publishers apologise for this error and have now uploaded the correct Table S5 to accompany the paper online.

AB - Upon publication of the above paper in early 2010, the authors noticed that a previous version of Supplementary Table S5 had been uploaded. The incorrect version did not rank the genes in order, which was vital to the understanding of their relative significance. The publishers apologise for this error and have now uploaded the correct Table S5 to accompany the paper online.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957242452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605933

DO - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605933

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:77957242452

VL - 103

SP - 1136

JO - BJC

JF - BJC

SN - 0007-0920

IS - 7

ER -