Fanning the Flames or a Troubling Truth? The Politics of Comparison in the Israel-Palestine Conflict
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
Abstract
The politics of comparison in the Israel-Palestine conflict is largely encapsulated in the use of two analogies. The first is the ‘Holocaust-Hitler analogy’ used by Israel and its supporters, which portrays Israel as a beleaguered nation surrounded by Nazi sympathisers who seek to destroy it as the Jewish homeland. The second is the ‘apartheid analogy’, which compares the conflict to that of Apartheid-era South Africa and portrays Palestinians as being the victims of racism and settler colonialism. This article analyses why, how and with what desired impact these two comparisons are invoked.
Bibliographical metadata
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Civil Wars |
Publisher | Routledge |
Pages | 53-77 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Volume | 21 |
Edition | 4 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 1743-968X |
ISBN (Print) | 1369-8249 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 7 Nov 2019 |
Publication series
Name | Civil Wars |
---|---|
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |