FAIR Principles: Interpretations and Implementation Considerations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • External authors:
  • Annika Jacobsen
  • Ricardo De Miranda Azevedo
  • Nick Juty
  • Dominique Batista
  • Simon Coles
  • Ronald Cornet
  • Mélanie Courtot
  • Mercè Crosas
  • Michel Dumontier
  • Chris T. Evelo
  • Giancarlo Guizzardi
  • Karsten Kryger Hansen
  • Ali Hasnain
  • Kristina Hettne
  • Jaap Heringa
  • Rob W.w. Hooft
  • Melanie Imming
  • Keith G. Jeffery
  • Rajaram Kaliyaperumal
  • Martijn G. Kersloot
  • Christine R. Kirkpatrick
  • Tobias Kuhn
  • Ignasi Labastida
  • Barbara Magagna
  • Peter Mcquilton
  • Natalie Meyers
  • Annalisa Montesanti
  • Mirjam Van Reisen
  • Philippe Rocca-serra
  • Robert Pergl
  • Susanna-assunta Sansone
  • Luiz Olavo Bonino Da Silva Santos
  • Juliane Schneider
  • George Strawn
  • Mark Thompson
  • Andra Waagmeester
  • Tobias Weigel
  • Mark D. Wilkinson
  • Egon L. Willighagen
  • Peter Wittenburg
  • Marco Roos
  • Barend Mons
  • Erik Schultes

Abstract

The FAIR principles have been widely cited, endorsed and adopted by a broad range of stakeholders since their publication in 2016. By intention, the 15 FAIR guiding principles do not dictate specific technological implementations, but provide guidance for improving Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability of digital resources.

This has likely contributed to the broad adoption of the FAIR principles, because individual stakeholder communities can implement their own FAIR solutions. However, it has also resulted in inconsistent interpretations that carry the risk of leading to incompatible implementations.

Thus, while the FAIR principles are formulated on a high level and may be interpreted and implemented in different ways, for true interoperability we need to support convergence in implementation choices that are widely accessible and (re)-usable.

We introduce the concept of FAIR implementation considerations to assist accelerated global participation and convergence towards accessible, robust, widespread and consistent FAIR implementations.

Any self-identified stakeholder community may either choose to reuse solutions from existing implementations, or when they spot a gap, accept the challenge to create the needed solution, which, ideally, can be used again by other communities in the future. Here, we provide interpretations and implementation considerations (choices and challenges) for each FAIR principle.

Bibliographical metadata

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10–29
Number of pages20
JournalData Intelligence
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019