Ethnic group population change and neighbourhood belongingCitation formats

  • Authors:
  • Nissa Finney
  • Stephen Jivraj

Standard

Ethnic group population change and neighbourhood belonging. / Finney, Nissa; Jivraj, Stephen.

In: Urban Studies, Vol. 50, No. 16, 2013, p. 3323-3341.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Finney, N & Jivraj, S 2013, 'Ethnic group population change and neighbourhood belonging', Urban Studies, vol. 50, no. 16, pp. 3323-3341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013482497

APA

Finney, N., & Jivraj, S. (2013). Ethnic group population change and neighbourhood belonging. Urban Studies, 50(16), 3323-3341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013482497

Vancouver

Finney N, Jivraj S. Ethnic group population change and neighbourhood belonging. Urban Studies. 2013;50(16):3323-3341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013482497

Author

Finney, Nissa ; Jivraj, Stephen. / Ethnic group population change and neighbourhood belonging. In: Urban Studies. 2013 ; Vol. 50, No. 16. pp. 3323-3341.

Bibtex

@article{a301c6d12ccc411bac6950bcbf096f46,
title = "Ethnic group population change and neighbourhood belonging",
abstract = "The community cohesion agenda in Britain has focused attention on the ethnic character of neighbourhoods and how population change affects cohesion. This paper examines the relationship between neighbourhood ethnic group population change and belonging. The paper measures population change as immigration, gross internal migration and with a categorisation of ethnic group population dynamics that combines migration and natural change. Pooled 2005 and 2007 Citizenship Survey data are analysed using multilevel logistic regression models. The paper does not find evidence for relationships between immigration or local population turnover and levels of neighbourhood belonging; nor is there evidence that ethnically differentiated population change matters. However, belonging does vary by individual's ethnicity; and strong belonging is associated with high co-ethnic density for minorities. In addition, the overall population change of an area may be significant: highest levels of belonging were found in areas of White and Minority population growth driven by migration. {\textcopyright} 2013 Urban Studies Journal Limited.",
author = "Nissa Finney and Stephen Jivraj",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1177/0042098013482497",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "3323--3341",
journal = "Urban Studies",
issn = "0042-0980",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",
number = "16",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnic group population change and neighbourhood belonging

AU - Finney, Nissa

AU - Jivraj, Stephen

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The community cohesion agenda in Britain has focused attention on the ethnic character of neighbourhoods and how population change affects cohesion. This paper examines the relationship between neighbourhood ethnic group population change and belonging. The paper measures population change as immigration, gross internal migration and with a categorisation of ethnic group population dynamics that combines migration and natural change. Pooled 2005 and 2007 Citizenship Survey data are analysed using multilevel logistic regression models. The paper does not find evidence for relationships between immigration or local population turnover and levels of neighbourhood belonging; nor is there evidence that ethnically differentiated population change matters. However, belonging does vary by individual's ethnicity; and strong belonging is associated with high co-ethnic density for minorities. In addition, the overall population change of an area may be significant: highest levels of belonging were found in areas of White and Minority population growth driven by migration. © 2013 Urban Studies Journal Limited.

AB - The community cohesion agenda in Britain has focused attention on the ethnic character of neighbourhoods and how population change affects cohesion. This paper examines the relationship between neighbourhood ethnic group population change and belonging. The paper measures population change as immigration, gross internal migration and with a categorisation of ethnic group population dynamics that combines migration and natural change. Pooled 2005 and 2007 Citizenship Survey data are analysed using multilevel logistic regression models. The paper does not find evidence for relationships between immigration or local population turnover and levels of neighbourhood belonging; nor is there evidence that ethnically differentiated population change matters. However, belonging does vary by individual's ethnicity; and strong belonging is associated with high co-ethnic density for minorities. In addition, the overall population change of an area may be significant: highest levels of belonging were found in areas of White and Minority population growth driven by migration. © 2013 Urban Studies Journal Limited.

U2 - 10.1177/0042098013482497

DO - 10.1177/0042098013482497

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 3323

EP - 3341

JO - Urban Studies

JF - Urban Studies

SN - 0042-0980

IS - 16

ER -