Comments on a new 'full colour' parton showerCitation formats

Standard

Comments on a new 'full colour' parton shower. / Holguin, Jack; Forshaw, Jeffrey; Plätzer, Simon.

7 p. 2020.

Research output: Other contribution

Harvard

APA

Holguin, J., Forshaw, J., & Plätzer, S. (2020, Mar 13). Comments on a new 'full colour' parton shower.

Vancouver

Author

Holguin, Jack ; Forshaw, Jeffrey ; Plätzer, Simon. / Comments on a new 'full colour' parton shower. 2020. 7 p.

Bibtex

@misc{e4adcf7fa75b4a3b9c52791a5a0d2517,
title = "Comments on a new 'full colour' parton shower",
abstract = "A new parton shower algorithm has been presented with the claim of providing soft-gluon resummation at `full colour' (arXiv:2001.11492). In this paper we show that the algorithm does not succeed in this goal. We show that full colour accuracy requires the Sudakov factors to be defined at amplitude level and that the simple parton-shower unitarity argument employed in arXiv:2001.11492 is not sufficient.",
author = "Jack Holguin and Jeffrey Forshaw and Simon Pl{\"a}tzer",
year = "2020",
month = mar,
day = "13",
language = "Undefined",
type = "Other",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Comments on a new 'full colour' parton shower

AU - Holguin, Jack

AU - Forshaw, Jeffrey

AU - Plätzer, Simon

PY - 2020/3/13

Y1 - 2020/3/13

N2 - A new parton shower algorithm has been presented with the claim of providing soft-gluon resummation at `full colour' (arXiv:2001.11492). In this paper we show that the algorithm does not succeed in this goal. We show that full colour accuracy requires the Sudakov factors to be defined at amplitude level and that the simple parton-shower unitarity argument employed in arXiv:2001.11492 is not sufficient.

AB - A new parton shower algorithm has been presented with the claim of providing soft-gluon resummation at `full colour' (arXiv:2001.11492). In this paper we show that the algorithm does not succeed in this goal. We show that full colour accuracy requires the Sudakov factors to be defined at amplitude level and that the simple parton-shower unitarity argument employed in arXiv:2001.11492 is not sufficient.

M3 - Other contribution

ER -