Children's reasoning on robots and gender

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

While previous research using quantitative measures indicates that children may regard the Zeno R-25 Milo model as strongly gendered as a boy, use of a more open question results in a wider range of responses and justifications from most children for why evaluation of gender is not appropriate to apply to the robot. The outcomes have implications for production of robots for CRI and developmental research.

Bibliographical metadata

Original languageUndefined
Title of host publication12th International Conference on Social Robotics
Publication statusPublished - 16 Nov 2020