Childhood Adversity and Borderline Personality DisorderCitation formats

  • External authors:
  • Carly Porter
  • Jasper Palmier-Claus
  • Alison Branitsky
  • Helen Warwick

Standard

Childhood Adversity and Borderline Personality Disorder : A Meta-Analysis. / Porter, Carly; Palmier-Claus, Jasper; Branitsky, Alison; Mansell, Warren; Warwick, Helen; Varese, Filippo.

In: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Vol. 141, No. 1, 01.01.2020, p. 6-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Porter, C, Palmier-Claus, J, Branitsky, A, Mansell, W, Warwick, H & Varese, F 2020, 'Childhood Adversity and Borderline Personality Disorder: A Meta-Analysis', Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13118

APA

Porter, C., Palmier-Claus, J., Branitsky, A., Mansell, W., Warwick, H., & Varese, F. (2020). Childhood Adversity and Borderline Personality Disorder: A Meta-Analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 141(1), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13118

Vancouver

Porter C, Palmier-Claus J, Branitsky A, Mansell W, Warwick H, Varese F. Childhood Adversity and Borderline Personality Disorder: A Meta-Analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2020 Jan 1;141(1):6-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13118

Author

Porter, Carly ; Palmier-Claus, Jasper ; Branitsky, Alison ; Mansell, Warren ; Warwick, Helen ; Varese, Filippo. / Childhood Adversity and Borderline Personality Disorder : A Meta-Analysis. In: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2020 ; Vol. 141, No. 1. pp. 6-20.

Bibtex

@article{bc0aa624bccb4d37ad5513008ca385f1,
title = "Childhood Adversity and Borderline Personality Disorder: A Meta-Analysis",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to better understand the magnitude and consistency of the association between childhood adversity and borderline personality disorder (BPD) across case-control, epidemiological and prospective cohort studies. Method: Following the review protocol (reference: CRD42017075179), search terms pertaining to adversity and BPD, were entered into three search engines. Random effects meta-analysis synthesised the size and consistency of the effects. Results: 97 studies compared BPD to non-clinical (k = 40) and clinical (k = 70) controls. Meta-analysis of case control studies indicated that individuals with BPD are 13.91 (95% CI 11.11-17.43) times more likely to report childhood adversity than non-clinical controls. This effect was smaller when considering retrospective cohort (OR: 2.59; 95% CI .93-7.30) and epidemiological (OR: 2.56, 95% CI 1.24-5.30) studies. Findings were significant across adversity subtypes with emotional abuse (OR: 38.11, 95% CI: 25.99-55.88) and neglect (OR: 17.73, 95% CI=13.01-24.17) demonstrating the largest effects. Individuals with BPD were 3.15 (95% CI 2.62-3.79) times more likely to report childhood adversity than other psychiatric groups. Conclusions: This meta-analysis corroborates theoretical proposals that exposure to adverse life experiences is associated with BPD. It highlights the importance of considering childhood adversity when treating people diagnosed with BPD. ",
keywords = "borderline personality disorder, adversity, trauma, Meta-analysis",
author = "Carly Porter and Jasper Palmier-Claus and Alison Branitsky and Warren Mansell and Helen Warwick and Filippo Varese",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/acps.13118",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
pages = "6--20",
journal = "Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-690X",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Childhood Adversity and Borderline Personality Disorder

T2 - A Meta-Analysis

AU - Porter, Carly

AU - Palmier-Claus, Jasper

AU - Branitsky, Alison

AU - Mansell, Warren

AU - Warwick, Helen

AU - Varese, Filippo

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to better understand the magnitude and consistency of the association between childhood adversity and borderline personality disorder (BPD) across case-control, epidemiological and prospective cohort studies. Method: Following the review protocol (reference: CRD42017075179), search terms pertaining to adversity and BPD, were entered into three search engines. Random effects meta-analysis synthesised the size and consistency of the effects. Results: 97 studies compared BPD to non-clinical (k = 40) and clinical (k = 70) controls. Meta-analysis of case control studies indicated that individuals with BPD are 13.91 (95% CI 11.11-17.43) times more likely to report childhood adversity than non-clinical controls. This effect was smaller when considering retrospective cohort (OR: 2.59; 95% CI .93-7.30) and epidemiological (OR: 2.56, 95% CI 1.24-5.30) studies. Findings were significant across adversity subtypes with emotional abuse (OR: 38.11, 95% CI: 25.99-55.88) and neglect (OR: 17.73, 95% CI=13.01-24.17) demonstrating the largest effects. Individuals with BPD were 3.15 (95% CI 2.62-3.79) times more likely to report childhood adversity than other psychiatric groups. Conclusions: This meta-analysis corroborates theoretical proposals that exposure to adverse life experiences is associated with BPD. It highlights the importance of considering childhood adversity when treating people diagnosed with BPD.

AB - Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to better understand the magnitude and consistency of the association between childhood adversity and borderline personality disorder (BPD) across case-control, epidemiological and prospective cohort studies. Method: Following the review protocol (reference: CRD42017075179), search terms pertaining to adversity and BPD, were entered into three search engines. Random effects meta-analysis synthesised the size and consistency of the effects. Results: 97 studies compared BPD to non-clinical (k = 40) and clinical (k = 70) controls. Meta-analysis of case control studies indicated that individuals with BPD are 13.91 (95% CI 11.11-17.43) times more likely to report childhood adversity than non-clinical controls. This effect was smaller when considering retrospective cohort (OR: 2.59; 95% CI .93-7.30) and epidemiological (OR: 2.56, 95% CI 1.24-5.30) studies. Findings were significant across adversity subtypes with emotional abuse (OR: 38.11, 95% CI: 25.99-55.88) and neglect (OR: 17.73, 95% CI=13.01-24.17) demonstrating the largest effects. Individuals with BPD were 3.15 (95% CI 2.62-3.79) times more likely to report childhood adversity than other psychiatric groups. Conclusions: This meta-analysis corroborates theoretical proposals that exposure to adverse life experiences is associated with BPD. It highlights the importance of considering childhood adversity when treating people diagnosed with BPD.

KW - borderline personality disorder

KW - adversity

KW - trauma

KW - Meta-analysis

U2 - 10.1111/acps.13118

DO - 10.1111/acps.13118

M3 - Article

VL - 141

SP - 6

EP - 20

JO - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-690X

IS - 1

ER -