Adequacy of Intraoperative Nodal Staging during Surgical Resection of NSCLC: Influencing Factors and Its Relationship to Survival

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • External authors:
  • Tim Edwards
  • Haval Balata
  • Mohamed Elshafi
  • Philip Foden
  • Paul Bishop
  • Eustace Fontaine
  • Mark Jones
  • Piotr Krysiak
  • Kandadai Rammohan
  • Rajesh Shah
  • Richard Booton
  • Matthew Evison

Abstract

Introduction Adequate intraoperative lymph node sampling is a fundamental part of lung cancer surgery, but adherence to standards is not well known. This study sought to measure the adequacy of intraoperative lymph node sampling at a regional Thoracic Surgery Centre and a tertiary lung cancer center in the United Kingdom. Methods This retrospective study analyzed the pathological reports from NSCLC resections over the 4-year period 2011–2014. Adequacy of sampling was assessed against International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer recommendations of at least three mediastinal lymph node stations: station 7 in all patients, station 5 or 6 in left upper lobe tumors, and station 9 in lower lobe tumors. The influence of clinical variables (age, tumor T stage, type of surgery, and laterality) on adequacy of sampling and the effect of adequacy on overall survival were also assessed. Results A total of 1301 NSCLC resections were performed from January 11, 2011, to December 31, 2014. Adequate intraoperative lymph node sampling increased significantly from 14% (22 of 160) in 2011 to 53% (206 of 390) in 2014 (p = 0.001). Secondary analysis of clinical variables also revealed that patients with T1a or T4 tumors, those undergoing sublobar resections, those undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery resections, and those undergoing left-sided resections have significantly higher rates of inadequate lymph node sampling. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in survival between patients with adequate versus inadequate intraoperative lymph node sampling or when survival was stratified according to overall stage. There was worse survival in inadequate sampling for patients with pN2 disease than for patients with pN2 disease and adequate sampling. Conclusion This study provides a much-needed benchmark of current thoracic surgical practice in lung cancer in the United Kingdom and important granularity to facilitate changes to improve adequacy of staging.

Bibliographical metadata

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1845-1850
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume12
Issue number12
Early online date4 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017