A Pragmatic Solution to the Problem of Category Crossing MetaphorsCitation formats

Standard

A Pragmatic Solution to the Problem of Category Crossing Metaphors. / Scott, Michael; Stevens, Graham.

In: Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, Vol. 15, 2016, p. 7-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Scott, M & Stevens, G 2016, 'A Pragmatic Solution to the Problem of Category Crossing Metaphors' Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, vol. 15, pp. 7-31.

APA

Scott, M., & Stevens, G. (2016). A Pragmatic Solution to the Problem of Category Crossing Metaphors. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, 15, 7-31.

Vancouver

Scott M, Stevens G. A Pragmatic Solution to the Problem of Category Crossing Metaphors. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations. 2016;15:7-31.

Author

Scott, Michael ; Stevens, Graham. / A Pragmatic Solution to the Problem of Category Crossing Metaphors. In: Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations. 2016 ; Vol. 15. pp. 7-31.

Bibtex

@article{179fc36b15e44a5680d42299b7ec3b03,
title = "A Pragmatic Solution to the Problem of Category Crossing Metaphors",
abstract = "A promising recent explanation of metaphorical language has come from pragmatics. Metaphor, and other departures from literal meaning, are all to be explained by the same set of pragmatic processes, namely narrowing, loosening, saturation, and sense-selection according to this explanation. However, the problem of emergent or category crossing metaphors arises when metaphors combine elements that cannot be meaningfully combined if construed literally. This sort of metaphor proves extremely hard to explain by appeal to the above mechanisms, leading many proponents of this analysis to seek explanations by appeal to additional mechanisms, some of which may be unique to metaphor interpretation, and thus susceptible to the charge that they are ad hoc. In this paper we first argue that these explanations are unsatisfactory, focusing in particular on what we take to be the most promising defense offered to date, Wilson and Carston (2008). We provide detailed arguments against their proposal. Secondly, we develop an account of category crossing metaphors that does not require the addition of any new processes beyond those listed above. We thus propose a novel, and complete, solution to the problem of category crossing metaphors which does not require any resources beyond those already recognized by mainstream theories of pragmatics",
author = "Michael Scott and Graham Stevens",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "7--31",
journal = "Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations",
issn = "1841-2394",
publisher = "Addleton Academic Publishers",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Pragmatic Solution to the Problem of Category Crossing Metaphors

AU - Scott, Michael

AU - Stevens, Graham

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - A promising recent explanation of metaphorical language has come from pragmatics. Metaphor, and other departures from literal meaning, are all to be explained by the same set of pragmatic processes, namely narrowing, loosening, saturation, and sense-selection according to this explanation. However, the problem of emergent or category crossing metaphors arises when metaphors combine elements that cannot be meaningfully combined if construed literally. This sort of metaphor proves extremely hard to explain by appeal to the above mechanisms, leading many proponents of this analysis to seek explanations by appeal to additional mechanisms, some of which may be unique to metaphor interpretation, and thus susceptible to the charge that they are ad hoc. In this paper we first argue that these explanations are unsatisfactory, focusing in particular on what we take to be the most promising defense offered to date, Wilson and Carston (2008). We provide detailed arguments against their proposal. Secondly, we develop an account of category crossing metaphors that does not require the addition of any new processes beyond those listed above. We thus propose a novel, and complete, solution to the problem of category crossing metaphors which does not require any resources beyond those already recognized by mainstream theories of pragmatics

AB - A promising recent explanation of metaphorical language has come from pragmatics. Metaphor, and other departures from literal meaning, are all to be explained by the same set of pragmatic processes, namely narrowing, loosening, saturation, and sense-selection according to this explanation. However, the problem of emergent or category crossing metaphors arises when metaphors combine elements that cannot be meaningfully combined if construed literally. This sort of metaphor proves extremely hard to explain by appeal to the above mechanisms, leading many proponents of this analysis to seek explanations by appeal to additional mechanisms, some of which may be unique to metaphor interpretation, and thus susceptible to the charge that they are ad hoc. In this paper we first argue that these explanations are unsatisfactory, focusing in particular on what we take to be the most promising defense offered to date, Wilson and Carston (2008). We provide detailed arguments against their proposal. Secondly, we develop an account of category crossing metaphors that does not require the addition of any new processes beyond those listed above. We thus propose a novel, and complete, solution to the problem of category crossing metaphors which does not require any resources beyond those already recognized by mainstream theories of pragmatics

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 7

EP - 31

JO - Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations

JF - Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations

SN - 1841-2394

ER -