A Defence of Substance CausationCitation formats

Standard

A Defence of Substance Causation. / Whittle, Ann.

In: Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Vol. 2, No. 1, 04.2016, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Whittle, A 2016, 'A Defence of Substance Causation', Journal of the American Philosophical Association , vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2016.1

APA

Whittle, A. (2016). A Defence of Substance Causation. Journal of the American Philosophical Association , 2(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2016.1

Vancouver

Whittle A. A Defence of Substance Causation. Journal of the American Philosophical Association . 2016 Apr;2(1):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2016.1

Author

Whittle, Ann. / A Defence of Substance Causation. In: Journal of the American Philosophical Association . 2016 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 1-20.

Bibtex

@article{719228dc362a420fb3f6649ea7de6c7a,
title = "A Defence of Substance Causation",
abstract = "That there is no substance causation is often treated as the default position. My aim in this paper is primarily one of burden shifting: opponents of substance causation must do more to defend their position. After outlining the thesis I wish to defend, I present a simple argument for substance causation, arguing that opponents of substance causation owe us an explanation of why this argument is unsound. I end by answering objections to the view that substances can be causes.",
author = "Ann Whittle",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1017/apa.2016.1",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of the American Philosophical Association",
issn = "2053-4485",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Defence of Substance Causation

AU - Whittle, Ann

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - That there is no substance causation is often treated as the default position. My aim in this paper is primarily one of burden shifting: opponents of substance causation must do more to defend their position. After outlining the thesis I wish to defend, I present a simple argument for substance causation, arguing that opponents of substance causation owe us an explanation of why this argument is unsound. I end by answering objections to the view that substances can be causes.

AB - That there is no substance causation is often treated as the default position. My aim in this paper is primarily one of burden shifting: opponents of substance causation must do more to defend their position. After outlining the thesis I wish to defend, I present a simple argument for substance causation, arguing that opponents of substance causation owe us an explanation of why this argument is unsound. I end by answering objections to the view that substances can be causes.

U2 - 10.1017/apa.2016.1

DO - 10.1017/apa.2016.1

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of the American Philosophical Association

JF - Journal of the American Philosophical Association

SN - 2053-4485

IS - 1

ER -