A comparison of the pragmatic patterns in the spontaneous because- and if-sentences produced by children and their caregivers.Citation formats

Standard

A comparison of the pragmatic patterns in the spontaneous because- and if-sentences produced by children and their caregivers. / Lemen, Heather; Lieven, E V M ; Theakston, Anna.

In: Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 185, No. November 2021, 20.09.2021, p. 15-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{237e7c277d8248d1847af44a928ac2a1,
title = "A comparison of the pragmatic patterns in the spontaneous because- and if-sentences produced by children and their caregivers.",
abstract = "Findings from corpus (e.g. Diessel, 2004) and comprehension (e.g. De Ruiter, Theakston, Brandt, & Lieven, 2018) studies show that children produce the adverbial connectives because and if long before they seem able to understand them. However, although children{\textquoteright}s comprehension is typically tested on sentences expressing the pragmatic relationship which Sweetser (1990) calls “Content”, children also hear and produce sentences expressing “Speech-Act” relationships (e.g. De Ruiter, Lemen, Lieven, Brandt & Theakston, 2021; Kyratzis, Guo, & Ervin-Tripp, 1990). To better understand the possible influence of pragmatic variation on 2- to 4-year-old children{\textquoteright}s acquisition of these connectives, we coded the because and if Speech-Act sentences of 14 British English-speaking mother-child dyads for the type of illocutionary act they contained, as well as the phrasing following the connective. Analyses revealed that children{\textquoteright}s because Speech-Act sentences were primarily explanations of Statements/Claims, while their if Speech-Act sentences typically related to permission and politeness. While children{\textquoteright}s because-sentences showed a great deal of individuality, their if-sentences closely resembled their mothers{\textquoteright}, containing a high proportion of recurring phrases which appear to be abstracted from input. We discuss how these patterns might help shape children{\textquoteright}s understanding of each connective and contribute to the children{\textquoteright}s overall difficulty with because and if.",
author = "Heather Lemen and Lieven, {E V M} and Anna Theakston",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
day = "20",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.016",
language = "English",
volume = "185",
pages = "15--34",
journal = "Journal of Pragmatics",
issn = "0378-2166",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "November 2021",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of the pragmatic patterns in the spontaneous because- and if-sentences produced by children and their caregivers.

AU - Lemen, Heather

AU - Lieven, E V M

AU - Theakston, Anna

PY - 2021/9/20

Y1 - 2021/9/20

N2 - Findings from corpus (e.g. Diessel, 2004) and comprehension (e.g. De Ruiter, Theakston, Brandt, & Lieven, 2018) studies show that children produce the adverbial connectives because and if long before they seem able to understand them. However, although children’s comprehension is typically tested on sentences expressing the pragmatic relationship which Sweetser (1990) calls “Content”, children also hear and produce sentences expressing “Speech-Act” relationships (e.g. De Ruiter, Lemen, Lieven, Brandt & Theakston, 2021; Kyratzis, Guo, & Ervin-Tripp, 1990). To better understand the possible influence of pragmatic variation on 2- to 4-year-old children’s acquisition of these connectives, we coded the because and if Speech-Act sentences of 14 British English-speaking mother-child dyads for the type of illocutionary act they contained, as well as the phrasing following the connective. Analyses revealed that children’s because Speech-Act sentences were primarily explanations of Statements/Claims, while their if Speech-Act sentences typically related to permission and politeness. While children’s because-sentences showed a great deal of individuality, their if-sentences closely resembled their mothers’, containing a high proportion of recurring phrases which appear to be abstracted from input. We discuss how these patterns might help shape children’s understanding of each connective and contribute to the children’s overall difficulty with because and if.

AB - Findings from corpus (e.g. Diessel, 2004) and comprehension (e.g. De Ruiter, Theakston, Brandt, & Lieven, 2018) studies show that children produce the adverbial connectives because and if long before they seem able to understand them. However, although children’s comprehension is typically tested on sentences expressing the pragmatic relationship which Sweetser (1990) calls “Content”, children also hear and produce sentences expressing “Speech-Act” relationships (e.g. De Ruiter, Lemen, Lieven, Brandt & Theakston, 2021; Kyratzis, Guo, & Ervin-Tripp, 1990). To better understand the possible influence of pragmatic variation on 2- to 4-year-old children’s acquisition of these connectives, we coded the because and if Speech-Act sentences of 14 British English-speaking mother-child dyads for the type of illocutionary act they contained, as well as the phrasing following the connective. Analyses revealed that children’s because Speech-Act sentences were primarily explanations of Statements/Claims, while their if Speech-Act sentences typically related to permission and politeness. While children’s because-sentences showed a great deal of individuality, their if-sentences closely resembled their mothers’, containing a high proportion of recurring phrases which appear to be abstracted from input. We discuss how these patterns might help shape children’s understanding of each connective and contribute to the children’s overall difficulty with because and if.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.016

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.016

M3 - Article

VL - 185

SP - 15

EP - 34

JO - Journal of Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Pragmatics

SN - 0378-2166

IS - November 2021

ER -